Is it a difference between small and large size HDDs?

Most seek times are in milliseconds, and usually under 20ms per seek on average. No noticeable affect when they're on the same drive. If you have a separate hard drive, then yes installing on the separate drive can greatly increase performance. The way Windows installs itself, not really. So i wonder is it really a good reason to separate windows partition from others? Those issues were that you could only have a set amount of files/folders on a partition at one time, (inodes), or that the filesystem couldn't use up all of the space. There was also a need to separate the partitions because of the limitations of the filesystems, but that hasn't been an issue for a LONG time. But as it turns out, that's an urban legend.The reason most people partition the OS onto a separate partition is in case you need/want to wipe/change your OS. Most people associate Osborne Computers with the Osborne Effect- pre-announcing the next model too early and decimating the sales of your current models. But even a 20 MHz Pentium is still orders of magnitude more powerful than this Osborne Executive: The actual minimum system requirements for Windows XP are a 233 MHz CPU and 64 megabytes of RAM. Do recognize the changing of the blue color on the screen before the 'Welcome'-page? At 20 MHz you can see all 8 blues line by line! The CPU is working at 60% of full capacity at the Desktop! Nowadays with a modern CPU you have to run many tasks in background to reach such a high level of work.įor this reason you had to have patience, very often. That puts the XP in back in Windows XP - Xtremely Pokey: I'm not sure exactly why, but the guys at managed to install Windows XP on a 20 megahertz Pentium 1 system with 32 megabytes of RAM:

Urban Tale for windows instal